Enterprise pricing is request-based and has no public standard pricing.
Pricing & TCO | quote needed for 60 seats
Vendor due diligence for software decisions
Go / No-Go vendor decisions backed by evidence.
EvidenceOps replaces the missing internal research analyst for software and vendor decisions. You get a short decision brief, a traceable evidence sheet, and the next checks required to defend the recommendation internally.
VerdictThe vendor call, stated plainly
EvidenceA source-ranked claim ledger
RiskBudget, control, compliance, lock-in
Next moveQuestions your team can send today
Visible output
Example review: Notion for a 25 to 60 person team
A concrete verdict, three decisive claims, and the sheet behind the recommendation. No invented logos needed.
Open full demo caseExport is available, but exit quality is still unknown.
Lock-in signal | pilot test required
Subprocessor geography needs internal acceptance.
Compliance surface | primary-source mapped
What gets solved
The work is not collecting more facts. It is knowing which facts decide the risk.
Budget exposure
Seat growth, plan limits, add-ons, and renewal exposure are pulled out of the pricing page and made decision-relevant.
Control fit
SSO, audit logs, SCIM, admin roles, and export paths are checked against the rollout your team actually needs.
Internal defensibility
Claims, contradictions, source quality, and open questions become a recommendation people can challenge and still understand.
Decision brief
Built for the internal review moment.
Short enough to circulate. Structured enough to answer the first objections from finance, operations, procurement, and technical reviewers.
VerdictGo / No-Go / conditional recommendation
WhyThe few facts that actually move the decision
Risk frameBudget, controls, compliance, lock-in, rollout
UnresolvedWhat is still unknown, and why it matters
VerificationOwner-ready checks for the vendor call or pilot
Method
A repeatable review system, not open-ended consulting.
Decision frame
Vendor, use case, budget, must-haves, deadline, known concerns.
Evidence pull
Pricing, docs, trust center, DPA/privacy, terms, status, external signals.
Claim ledger
Source quality, confidence, impact, likelihood, contradictions, follow-up need.
Verdict brief
Decision, reasons, risk frame, unresolved questions, verification queue.
Packages
Review depth matched to decision risk.
The packages are framed around decision exposure: fast triage, internal approval, or materially expensive mistakes.
Rapid Screen
EUR 300
Fast triage before a vendor consumes the week.
- 1 vendor / tool
- 6-10 top sources
- 15-30 evidence claims
- Red flags and dealbreakers
- 1-2 page decision note
- Evidence sheet
Scope guard: No market scan. No comparison matrix. Alternatives only if provided or booked as add-on.
Request Rapid ScreenStandard Decision
EUR 900
A defendable vendor decision for internal review.
- 1 primary vendor
- 12-25 top sources
- 40-80 evidence claims
- 3-5 page decision brief
- TCO traps and plan-fit risks
- Conflict and uncertainty block
- Evidence sheet
- Verification queue
Scope guard: Comparison matrix optional when named alternatives are in scope.
Request Standard DecisionDeep Review
EUR 2,200
For decisions where being wrong is materially expensive.
- 1 primary vendor plus named alternatives
- 25-60 top sources
- 100-200 evidence claims
- 6-12 page decision brief
- Risk matrix
- DPA / SLA / SOC 2 evidence review
- Evidence sheet
- Comparison matrix
Scope guard: Not legal advice. Not penetration testing. Not contract redlining.
Request Deep ReviewTrust boundaries
Clear scope makes the recommendation more credible.
Inside scope
Decision support, evidence mapping, risk framing, verification queue.
Outside scope
Legal advice, security certification, penetration testing, contract redlining.
Clock starts
After scope confirmation and receipt of required inputs.
Source base
Public sources plus customer- or vendor-provided documents.
Fit
Built for teams that need a decision others can review.
Good fit
- 20-200 employee teams
- Software, AI, ops, knowledge, procurement, or vendor tooling
- Budget, controls, compliance, or lock-in matter
- The decision must survive internal review
- No internal analyst capacity
Not a fit
- You only need a feature list
- The decision is already made
- Price is the only criterion
- You need legal advice
- You need technical security testing
- You expect a full market scan inside a Rapid Screen
Request scope
Get the right review level before you pay.
Send the vendor, use case, main concern, and deadline. You receive a package recommendation, scope assumptions, and required inputs by email.
Scope fitWhich review level fits?
Decision stage
Deadline
Primary risk
Needed output
Recommended pathStandard Decision
Best when the vendor decision needs to be defended in internal review.
Use this recommendation in the scope request